Custom vs. off-the-shelf target date funds
The Department of Labor (DOL) has provided guidance to retirement plan fiduciaries to help select and monitor target date funds (TDFs). Among the guidance is the DOL’s suggestion that plan sponsors determine whether custom TDFs would better fit their plan’s participant base than off-the-shelf TDFs.
Key considerations in determining if custom TDFs would be appropriate are whether the plan is of adequate size and its population homogenous. Custom TDFs are a viable option for defined contribution plans with assets of $100 million or more. According to PIMCO, 40 of the 100 largest defined contribution plans use custom TDFs, with usage increasing to 50% for plans with assets greater than $10 billion. Also, when plan populations have wide variation in salaries and retirement ages, it can be challenging to design a ‘one-sizefits-all’ glide path.
Incomplete knowledge of participants’ true financial condition (such as outside assets and benefits) also makes it difficult to design the ideal glide path.
Defining a Custom Target Date Fund
Custom TDFs are investment options designed by the plan sponsor or its advisor to better take into account knowledge about participant base. The main types of customization are below:
- The glide path is designed to suit a plan’s demographics (such as availability of defined benefit plan, company stock expected retirement age, etc.). Generally, an investment manager designs and manages the glide path. AB (formerly Alliance Bernstein) estimates that the average cost of designing and managing a custom glide path is about 0.10%.
- The plan’s consultant or the plan sponsor selects the underlying investment managers.
- The plan’s record keeper or custodian manages the cash flows and portfolio rebalancing.
Although, there are many variations of semi customization, the key types relate to the glide path and investments:
- Glide Path: The plan sponsor or the consultant selects the underlying funds but uses an off-the-shelf glide path.
- Investments: Minor changes are made to an offthe-shelf glide-path (such as stock-bond mix, ‘landing’ point, etc.). In addition, the plan sponsor may change the underlying fund line-up and/or add additional asset classes (such as high-yield bonds and real assets).
|Glide path||Designed to take into account the specific needs of the plan participants.||No control over glide path design.|
Potential for lower fees:
Three major components of fee are:
|Fees are dependent on the assets in TDFs.|
|Recordkeeping platform||Fewer recordkeeping platforms can accommodate custom TDFs.||Most recordkeeping platforms offer a wide variety of off-the-shelf TDFs.|
|Administration||Ongoing management, oversight and reporting require greater involvement and are more complex.||Plan sponsor involvement is lower.|
||Record keeper provides participant
Designing custom TDFs can result in superior retirement outcomes for plan participants, whether through better glide path designs, better investment structures and manager selection or through cost containment. Custom TDFs, however, require TDF assets of at least $100 million and a participant base that is relatively homogenous. Careful consideration should be given to the plan sponsor’s ability to oversee the development and management of custom TDFs.
GENERAL DISCLOSURE: This paper is intended for sophisticated and/or accredited investors and is for illustrative use only. While the assumptions, data and models used to develop the information contained herein are from sources deemed to be reliable, there can be no certainty or guarantee regarding the likelihood of the outcomes as presented. This document is not and should not be construed as legal, taxation or investment advice. Any investment advice would be delivered pursuant to a written agreement and legal and taxation advice should be obtained from appropriate and qualified professionals. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without our prior written permission. © 2015 Pavilion Advisory Group Inc.